Story first appeared in:
LARKSPUR
The panorama of sprawling pastures dotted with ponderosa pines and towering sq. buttes that bridges Interstate 25 south of Citadel Rock and north of Monument is huge, quiet and largely undeveloped.
Colorado voters wished it that approach 25 years in the past when conservation teams, a former governor and a billionaire stepped in to endlessly shield this high-profile hall from future improvement.
On a current chilly January morning, the 17,700-acre Greenland Ranch sits serenely alongside the freeway, one among a number of historic ranches saved by conservation easements. Championed by former Colorado Gov. Roy Romer and native cable magnate John Malone, the huge open-space undertaking was designed to cease fast-growing Denver and Colorado Springs from merging into an enormous metroplex.
Key to the enterprise was preserving the infinite views that absorb Pikes Peak to the south, Longs Peak to the north and, on a transparent day, even the Wyoming border.
Solely a handful of homes have been allowed to be constructed on these protected lands, usually no a couple of or two constructions on tracts that cowl a whole lot of acres. Along with the Greenland undertaking, a sequence of different easements alongside Higher Lake Gulch Street have been additionally put in place.
No roofs have been imagined to ever pierce that spectacular set of views.
However drive alongside Higher Lake Gulch Street east of I-25 and look south towards Greenland Ranch and the roofline of a big two-story log residence at 3000 Higher Lake Gulch Street is clearly seen.

A house being constructed on a ridge line on a conservation easement in Larkspur has conservationists up in arms as they declare the development violates phrases of the easement by not being hidden from view. (Michael Ciaglo, Particular to The Colorado Solar)
And that may be a violation of the unique phrases of the easement, one thing that isn’t imagined to occur on lands protected by the state at a price of $1.1 billion since 1995, in response to an financial impression examine by Colorado State College’s Colorado Pure Heritage Program (CNHP). Whether or not extra must be performed to stop such expensive errors is an open query within the conservation group, the place outrage over the issue of unenforced easements is rising.
There are 7,593 parcels of land in Colorado which can be beneath some type of conservation easement, in response to a Colorado Solar evaluation of information supplied by the Colorado Pure Heritage Program. They cowl nearly 4 million acres, or almost 6% of the land mass of the state. In keeping with CNHP’s examine, the state has garnered $35 billion to $57 billion in financial advantages from them.
Click on right here to see this knowledge with extra info in a desk.
Monitoring these hundreds of easements to make sure that new constructions don’t intrude with view corridors and that pastures aren’t overgrazed, for instance, is the job of the nonprofit land trusts and native governments who’re accountable for monitoring and defending them.
However on this occasion, the land belief charged with imposing the foundations of the easement, the Douglas Land Conservancy, didn’t alert the state when issues started cropping up after the property was bought in 2022.
“There was a screwup of gigantic proportions, and issues fell by the cracks,” mentioned Sydney Macy, the outstanding conservationist who led the cost to guard the hall.
How is it imagined to work?
Conservation easements are authorized agreements during which property house owners surrender improvement rights on their land, usually in change for state and federal tax credit. A key aspect of negotiating such easements is gaining approval for the situation and top of any constructions that could be constructed. New buildings and barns should not intrude with the conservation values of the land.

This story first appeared in
Colorado Sunday, a premium journal publication for members.
Expertise the very best in Colorado information at a slower tempo, with considerate articles, distinctive adventures and a studying checklist that’s an ideal match for a Sunday morning.
Below Colorado legislation, finalized conservation easements should be held by nonprofit land trusts and typically native governments, that are accountable for imposing the phrases of the deal, ensuring that homes are inbuilt designated areas, referred to as constructing envelopes. The agreements exist endlessly, or “in perpetuity” to qualify for the tax credit and to obtain different state funds.
However on this occasion, the Douglas Land Conservancy (DLC) didn’t uphold the phrases of the easement, conservation teams cost, permitting the home to be constructed on a hill and to embody not one story, as initially agreed to, however two.
At one level, Douglas County constructing officers stopped the undertaking to make sure the land belief was conscious of the constructing plans, however finally it was allowed to proceed, in response to county paperwork.
Laura Sanford, government director of the Douglas Land Conservancy, declined to debate the chain of occasions that allowed building on the two-story residence to start. The proprietor, Steve Lockton, didn’t reply to an interview request.
Roughly 40 land trusts function in Colorado, in response to the state’s Division of Conservation. Simply 17, together with DLC, have been accredited by the nationwide fee, in response to its spokeswoman, Lisa McCarthy. McCarthy declined to touch upon issues on the DLC, citing the nationwide fee’s confidentiality coverage.
However the fee has been in contact with the DLC. Sanford mentioned her workers had been cooperating with the company’s requests for info. Its accreditation has lately been renewed, in response to the fee’s web site.
That’s little consolation to Macy.
“The truth that this land belief has blown it speaks to a bigger subject,” Macy mentioned. “These land trusts have been entrusted with stewarding these properties and imposing the phrases of the easements. That the land belief dropped the ball is a harbinger of what else may occur on the market with out land trusts taking their tasks significantly.”


LEFT: Conservationist Sydney Macy stands for a portrait overlooking the Greenland Ranch conservation easement in Larkspur. RIGHT: Snow covers the Greenland Ranch’s land. Colorado has spent hundreds of thousands to protect legacy landscapes with conservation easements, however violations which can be unenforced by the state are encroaching on the lands these easements have been meant to guard. (Michael Ciaglo, Particular to The Colorado Solar)
For a time within the early 2000s, the Colorado Conservation Easement program was affected by fraud, as land with little worth was positioned beneath easement and improperly claimed tax credit. However in 2018, after a long time of litigation and scrutiny from state lawmakers, the Division of Conservation was created to supervise land trusts and easements.
The state of Colorado tracks almost 800 easements, in response to Aaron Welch, director of the Division of Conservation and requires that land trusts undergo its certification course of. One piece of that certification is agreeing to report violations that happen. On this occasion, Welch mentioned his division has solely lately grow to be conscious of the Higher Lake Gulch Street violation and he mentioned he believed it has been adequately addressed.
Welch estimates that violations happen on roughly 1% of the properties it displays yearly. However the place the violations have occurred and the character of these violations isn’t clear. Welch declined to launch that info, citing confidentiality guidelines in place to guard conservation easement house owners. A Colorado Open Data Act request filed by the Colorado Solar to acquire the violation knowledge is pending.
“The problem of stewardship and the issue of violations turns into larger with the passage of time,” Welch mentioned. “When the unique landowner grants an easement, they know full properly what’s in that easement as a result of they negotiated the phrases. However as time passes, there’s a larger probability that the brand new landowner doesn’t have an appreciation of that easement. That’s only a actuality.”

The easements the Division of Conservation displays have been issued state tax credit valued at about $500 million, Welch mentioned. By the point this system ends in 2031, he expects that quantity will rise to $850 million.
Nice Outdoor Colorado, a state company that makes use of lottery proceeds to guard lands, has helped shield greater than 1.7 million acres, in response to its web site, together with the huge Greenlands Ranch undertaking and Higher Lake Gulch Street. It invested greater than $11 million within the two undertakings, in response to GOCO Deputy Director Josh Tenneson.
GOCO investigated the Higher Lake Gulch Street easement final fall, after it was contacted by Macy. Weeks of negotiations involving GOCO and the Douglas Land Conservancy adopted, with everybody ultimately agreeing to a settlement, regardless of the dispute. In keeping with the Douglas County Constructing Division, building on the house shouldn’t be but full.
Tenneson mentioned issues started in 2022 because the property was altering fingers. The previous government director of the land conservancy, who oversaw the unique easement, was retiring, and the present government director, Laura Sanford, was simply coming in. She accredited the brand new location of the home with out amending the easement and with out notifying Nice Outdoor Colorado. As soon as the approval was granted, the proprietor utilized for a constructing allow, which was granted in October of 2023 as soon as the land conservancy gave the go-ahead.
GOCO didn’t be taught of the issue for almost a yr, properly after building was underway.
“Technically, it was a violation as a result of the landowner was not permitted by the phrases of the easement to construct there,” Tenneson mentioned. “It shouldn’t have been accredited. However to treatment it, we required quite a few adjustments to the easement that we expect present higher safety than the unique settlement.”
The adjustments embody a requirement to plant bushes in entrance of the home, to partially defend the construction from view alongside Higher Lake Gulch Street, and to scale back the scale of the realm on which new constructions might be constructed to 4 acres from 5. The precise to create a lake or construct a boathouse and dock on the property was additionally eliminated, Tenneson mentioned.
Tenneson mentioned Colorado’s work on maintaining conserved lands secure and intact is a significant enterprise that’s rising as authentic easement holders promote their lands to others and as small land trusts wrestle to hold out their protecting mission.
“This has been a lesson realized for GOCO,” Tenneson mentioned.


LEFT: Higher Gulch Lake Street heads west towards the mountains because it bisects the 2 conservation easements: Greenland Ranch, left, and JA Ranch, proper. RIGHT: Street indicators warning of winter upkeep sit alongside East Higher Gulch Lake Street close to the Greenland Ranch and JA Ranch conservation easements. (Michael Ciaglo, Particular to The Colorado Solar)
And for others as properly. Beth Conover, performing director of Maintain It Colorado, a statewide coalition of land trusts, mentioned her company is within the midst of figuring out the place issues are occurring and discovering methods to maneuver conserved lands to bigger land trusts which have the monetary and authorized experience to guard them.
Former state Rep. Don Eberle owns the land subsequent door to 3000 Higher Lake Gulch Street. He was in a position to place his land beneath easement, partially due to the pristine views. That this new, towering residence has been constructed within the coronary heart of the viewshed there’s a grave disappointment to him.
“Defending the views was central to this work,” Eberle mentioned, referring to the marketing campaign to avoid wasting the long-lasting Douglas County ranches alongside the I-25 hall.
“I keep in mind when folks have been nervous about all of the land being developed between Colorado Springs and Denver. Folks have been begging” for it to be protected, he mentioned.
To Eberle, the push to higher shield Colorado’s legacy landscapes must develop exponentially.
“It’s discouraging,” he mentioned. “There’s a danger there that I’m not certain that folks perceive and it exists on all the conservation easements which were issued. The general public has invested in them. State cash goes into them and there’s an expectation that they are going to be protected. The entire program has been touted as a strategy to save Colorado land. It’s a frightening job.”
