By Colleen Slevin and Jesse Bedayn, The Related Press
On the heels of a U.S. Supreme Court docket victory this summer season for a graphic artist who didn’t need to design wedding ceremony web sites for same-sex {couples}, Colorado’s highest courtroom mentioned Tuesday it is going to now hear the case of a Christian baker who refused to make a cake celebrating a gender transition.
The announcement by the Colorado Supreme Court docket is the most recent improvement within the yearslong authorized saga involving Jack Phillips and LGBTQ+ rights.
Phillips gained a partial victory earlier than the U.S. Supreme Court docket in 2018 after refusing to make a homosexual couple’s wedding ceremony cake.
He was later sued by Autumn Scardina, a transgender girl, after Phillips and his suburban Denver bakery refused to make a pink cake with blue frosting for her birthday and to have fun her gender transition.
Scardina, an lawyer, mentioned she introduced the lawsuit to “problem the veracity” of Phillips’ statements that he would serve LGBTQ+ prospects. Her lawyer mentioned her cake order was not a “arrange” supposed to file a lawsuit.
The Colorado Supreme Court docket didn’t clarify how or why it made the willpower to listen to the case. It was introduced in an extended record of choices about which instances they’ll hear and reject.
The case includes the state’s anti-discrimination legislation that makes it unlawful to refuse to offer companies to folks based mostly on protected traits like race, faith or sexual orientation. The important thing problem within the case is whether or not the muffins Phillips creates are a type of speech and whether or not forcing him to make a cake with a message he doesn’t assist is a violation of his First Modification proper to free speech.
Earlier this yr, the Colorado Court docket of Appeals sided with Scardina within the case, ruling that the cake — on which Scardina didn’t request any writing — was not a type of speech. It additionally discovered that the state’s anti-discrimination legislation doesn’t violate enterprise homeowners’ proper to observe or categorical their faith.
Graphic artist Lorie Smith, who can be from Colorado and can be represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom, challenged the identical state legislation within the 303 Artistic case that was determined by the U.S. Supreme Court docket in June. The courtroom’s conservative majority mentioned forcing her to create web sites for same-sex weddings would violate her free speech rights.
Either side within the dispute over Scardina’s cake order suppose the brand new U.S. Supreme Court docket ruling will bolster their arguments.
“We’re grateful that the Colorado Supreme Court docket will hear Jack Phillips’ case to hopefully uphold each Coloradan’s freedom to precise what they consider,” mentioned Jake Warner, Phillips’ Alliance Defending Freedom lawyer. “Jack has been focused for years by opponents of free speech, and because the U.S. Supreme Court docket not too long ago held in 303 Artistic v. Elenis, nobody must be pressured to precise messages they disagree with.”
Scardina’s lawyer, John McHugh, mentioned that the 303 Artistic ruling was slender and utilized solely to companies which might be creating speech of their very own — which the Colorado Court docket of Appeals had already dominated didn’t embody Phillips’ firm making the cake.
“It’s crucial for companies and the general public in Colorado to grasp that our anti-discrimination legislation nonetheless is in full power and there’s no normal proper to discriminate in opposition to folks in Colorado in the event you’re a enterprise proprietor,” McHugh mentioned.
Phillips requested the state Supreme Court docket to contemplate his enchantment in April.
College of Denver Regulation Professor Alan Chen mentioned Tuesday that the Colorado Supreme Court docket must decide if baking a pink cake with blue frosting and no writing “is extra like designing an internet site or extra like renting chairs.”
“If it’s not speech, then the one cause that Phillips is refusing to make it’s due to the transgender standing of his consumer, and that violates the legislation,” Chen mentioned.
Scardina tried to order her cake on the identical day in 2017 that the U.S. Supreme Court docket introduced it will hear Phillips’ enchantment within the wedding ceremony cake case.
Earlier than submitting her lawsuit, Scardina first filed a grievance in opposition to Phillips with the state and the civil rights fee, which discovered possible trigger that he had discriminated in opposition to her.
Phillips then filed a federal lawsuit in opposition to Colorado, accusing it of a “campaign to crush” him by pursuing the grievance.
In March 2019, legal professionals for the state and Phillips agreed to drop each instances underneath a settlement Scardina was not concerned in. She pursued the lawsuit in opposition to Phillips and Masterpiece Cakeshop on her personal.
No date was set for a listening to within the case. Either side must submit their authorized arguments to the courtroom within the coming months.
___
Bedayn is a corps member for the Related Press/Report for America Statehouse Information Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit nationwide service program that locations journalists in native newsrooms to report on undercovered points.
___
Related Press reporter Amy Beth Hanson contributed from Helena, Montana.
