In early 2017, American intelligence companies delivered an unequivocal judgment about why President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia had ordered a sprawling effort to sabotage the current American presidential election.
Mr. Putin needed to cripple the religion People have in their very own elections, they discovered, and to undermine a United States-led “liberal world order” that the Russians see as a risk to their safety. As a technique to obtain this objective, the evaluation discovered, Russia labored to assist Donald J. Trump win the election.
Eight years later, Mr. Trump sat within the Oval Workplace for a blustery assembly with President Voldymyr Zelensky of Ukraine and rendered, as soon as once more, his personal judgment on that interval. There was no Russian sabotage, only a “phony witch hunt” of which each he and Mr. Putin have been victims.
“Let me inform you, Putin went by a hell of so much with me,” he mentioned.
The assertion was a inform. The president sees widespread trigger with Mr. Putin, a merging of pursuits solid by battles towards these he believes are his and Mr. Putin’s mutual adversaries — together with Democratic lawmakers, European leaders and a spectral “deep state” contained in the U.S. authorities.
The connection between Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin has for years been scrutinized by American authorities inquiries, assessments by overseas intelligence companies and information media investigations. Taken collectively, they’ve unearthed proof to help an array of theories addressing Mr. Trump’s affinity for a Russian strongman who has spent a profession attempting to undermine American pursuits.
As but, there is no such thing as a single, tidy rationalization. However primarily based solely on Mr. Trump’s public actions throughout his first six weeks again in workplace, the straightforward truth is that he has made few selections on nationwide safety or overseas coverage that haven’t been cheered by the Kremlin, making his stance towards Mr. Putin extra consequential than ever.
This can be a world turned the wrong way up for Susan Miller, the previous head of counterintelligence on the C.I.A., who led the company’s 2017 intelligence evaluation on Russian election interference.
Ms. Miller mentioned in an interview that she thinks Mr. Trump’s affinity for the Russian president boils all the way down to “autocrat envy”— that he covets the ability Mr. Putin has to make selections in Russia with none constraints.
“Trump likes Putin as a result of Putin has management over his nation,” she mentioned. “And Trump needs management over his nation.”
Mr. Trump has accused Mr. Zelensky of starting the warfare that began with a Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, a warfare that has seen the mass slaughter of Ukrainian civilians. He has stopped sharing intelligence with Ukraine that the nation desperately must battle Russian forces.
He has gutted American overseas help packages that Mr. Putin has lengthy detested, together with pro-democracy packages in nations like Hungary that Russia is bringing nearer into its sphere of affect. He has sidelined European allies, saying they’re untrustworthy and suggesting they may should fend for themselves sooner or later.
Mr. Trump has defended his actions partially by saying they’re mandatory steps to getting Russia to the negotiating desk, casting himself as a peace dealer to finish the warfare in Ukraine. To date, nonetheless, he has pushed far more durable on Mr. Zelensky to make concessions than he has on Mr. Putin.
On Friday, he started the day with a social media publish threatening financial sanctions towards Russia for what he mentioned was the “pounding” the Russian navy was delivering in Ukraine. Within the Oval Workplace hours later, nonetheless, he appeared to defend Mr. Putin, saying that Russia “bombing the hell out of Ukraine” was really an indication that Russia needed an finish to the warfare. He criticized Ukraine for not, in his view, being as motivated to finish the battle.
“What’s Putin getting? He’s getting greater than he and different former Okay.G.B. officers ever dreamed of,” mentioned Calder Walton of Harvard’s Kennedy Faculty of Authorities, who wrote a e book on the historical past of espionage between Russia and the USA.
“That is the dismantling earlier than our eyes of the U.S.-led worldwide order, one thing that Putin has labored towards his total profession,” he mentioned.
How a lot does all this please Russian officers? Simply ask them.
Dmitry Peskov, the Kremlin’s longtime spokesman, went on state tv two days after the Oval Workplace blowup with Mr. Zelensky and praised the Trump administration’s selections since coming to energy. The brand new White Home agenda, he mentioned, “largely aligns with our imaginative and prescient.”
That very same day, Sergey V. Lavrov, Mr. Putin’s overseas minister, offered Russians with a wholly completely different tackle world historical past than the one which Kremlin officers have taught for many years. Mr. Lavrov mentioned it was European nations, not the USA, that have been accountable for so lots of historical past’s nice tragedies — citing the Crusades, the Napoleonic wars, World Warfare I and the rise of Hitler.
“If we take a look at historical past looking back,” he mentioned, “the People didn’t play any instigating, not to mention incendiary, function.”
Ms. Miller mentioned there was little question amongst members of her counterintelligence crew about Russia’s intentions in disrupting the 2016 election: to unfold disinformation and sow chaos with the purpose of undermining confidence within the democratic course of.
On the identical time, she mentioned, her company crew — which was joined by officers from the Nationwide Safety Company and the F.B.I. — was extraordinarily cautious and fiercely nonpartisan in assessing what impression the Russian interference had on Mr. Trump’s election victory.
Nonetheless, throughout the first Trump administration she discovered herself within the cross hairs of the crew of prosecutors led by John Durham, whom Legal professional Basic William P. Barr had appointed to analyze the origins of the F.B.I.’s Russia investigation. She mentioned that Mr. Durham and different prosecutors grilled her for greater than eight hours in regards to the intelligence evaluation.
“They have been searching for bias in our work,” Ms. Miller mentioned. “They didn’t discover any.” Mr. Durham’s closing report discovered no fault with the 2017 intelligence evaluation.
Nonetheless, Mr. Trump’s anger about what he calls the “Russia hoax” has festered for years, a grievance so deep he now sees Mr. Putin as his ally in victimhood.
Mr. Putin has spent years attempting to form Mr. Trump’s considering on Ukraine, and there may be now little daylight between each males’s public statements in regards to the warfare.
The primary time that Mr. Trump and Mr. Putin met in individual, throughout a July 2017 summit in Hamburg, Germany, the Russian president used a lot of the time disparaging Ukraine as a corrupt, fabricated nation.
He mentioned that Russia had each proper to exert affect over Ukraine. He even justified Russian navy operations within the nation by elevating the historic instance of President Theodore Roosevelt’s perception that the USA had the appropriate to intervene within the inner affairs of Latin American nations.
Mr. Trump is a longtime admirer of Roosevelt.
Leaving the assembly, Rex Tillerson, then the secretary of state, advised anxious White Home aides that Mr. Putin had carried out his “Okay.G.B. shtick,” and that Mr. Trump had not pushed again on any of the Russian president’s assertions about Ukraine.
Greater than two years later, the Home impeached Mr. Trump due to a July 2019 cellphone name he had with Mr. Zelensky, throughout which he made continued American navy help to Ukraine contingent on Mr. Zelensky serving to dig up grime on his political opponents.
The episode additional radicalized Mr. Trump’s views not solely towards Ukraine but additionally to his perceived “deep state” enemies who testified throughout the impeachment proceedings.
It additionally started to radicalize different Republicans towards Ukraine, who started to echo a few of the language that Mr. Putin has lengthy used in regards to the nation.
This convergence of views has turn out to be much more pronounced within the weeks since Mr. Trump got here again to energy, as his administration presses Ukraine to barter a peace cope with Russia.
On Wednesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio characterised the battle in Ukraine on Fox Information not as a transparent case of Russian aggression, however as a harmful “proxy warfare” between the USA and Russia.
Mr. Peskov, the Kremlin spokesman, mentioned in an announcement afterward that he agreed solely. It was, he mentioned, one other instance of the positions of the White Home and the Kremlin aligning “completely.”
